<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Ultram Online Without Prescription &raquo; We Always Have The LOWEST Pharmacy Online-Offers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/</link>
	<description>Squandering bits since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ultram Online Without Prescription &raquo; We Always Have The LOWEST Pharmacy Online-Offers</title>
		<link>http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>It does seem that we will be stuck with passwords for a while, yes. And yet, we all agree that they are not a great security scheme. The amount of passwords we need nowadays makes it nearly impossible to avoid password reuse or using bad passwords. Software like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/passsafe.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Password Safe&lt;/a&gt; makes it a bit easier to cope with passwords, but introduces a hairy single point of failure.

I know it is difficult, but I still hope that we will soon find a better alternative to user identification than passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem that we will be stuck with passwords for a while, yes. And yet, we all agree that they are not a great security scheme. The amount of passwords we need nowadays makes it nearly impossible to avoid password reuse or using bad passwords. Software like <a href="http://www.schneier.com/passsafe.html" rel="nofollow">Password Safe</a> makes it a bit easier to cope with passwords, but introduces a hairy single point of failure.</p>
<p>I know it is difficult, but I still hope that we will soon find a better alternative to user identification than passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ultram Online Without Prescription &raquo; We Always Have The LOWEST Pharmacy Online-Offers</title>
		<link>http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-61259</link>
		<dc:creator>ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/#comment-61259</guid>
		<description>It does seem that we will be stuck with passwords for a while, yes. And yet, we all agree that they are not a great security scheme. The amount of passwords we need nowadays makes it nearly impossible to avoid password reuse or using bad passwords. Software like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schneier.com/passsafe.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Password Safe&lt;/a&gt; makes it a bit easier to cope with passwords, but introduces a hairy single point of failure.

I know it is difficult, but I still hope that we will soon find a better alternative to user identification than passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem that we will be stuck with passwords for a while, yes. And yet, we all agree that they are not a great security scheme. The amount of passwords we need nowadays makes it nearly impossible to avoid password reuse or using bad passwords. Software like <a href="http://www.schneier.com/passsafe.html" rel="nofollow">Password Safe</a> makes it a bit easier to cope with passwords, but introduces a hairy single point of failure.</p>
<p>I know it is difficult, but I still hope that we will soon find a better alternative to user identification than passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ultram Online Without Prescription &raquo; We Always Have The LOWEST Pharmacy Online-Offers</title>
		<link>http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/#comment-1869</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, more and more alternatives to &#8216;old fashioned passwords&#8217; are appearing: using fingerprints, those ID thigies you plug into the computer and, voil?É , you&#8217;re logged in, RFID (ugh), etc&#8230;</p>
<p>The problem, I guess, is interoperability.  If you choose a certain way of identifying yourself with your machinery, will it work with everything?  Will it work on every machine you have access to?  Will it be easy to use?  Sadly, I think the answer to these questions is NO; it will work only in some machines, only  with some particular software &amp; hardware, only on a particular OS&#8230;. </p>
<p>Now, I know some people are perfectly happy with one of those new ThinkPads with a fingerprint reader; yet I&#8217;m not sure I would be.  Yeah, it would be cool to use it, but would it work with Linux?  If the software got -somehow- corrupted would I have a way to (a) log into the computer (b) fix it? etc&#8230;  I must also admit I&#8217;m quite reluctant to embrace new technologies that require a significant investment just to try them out.</p>
<p>So, it seems we&#8217;re stuck with good old fashioned passwords for a while.</p>
<p>And passwords are not perfect, far from it.  Yes, they can be secured if the user understands (and cares about) the dangers / issues related to using passwords to protect sensitive content &#8230; but I guess we&#8217;ve all seen things that make those of us who are tech-savy shake our heads: passwords like &#8220;12345&#8243;, using the same simple password for sensitive accounts and stupid web accounts, password = login, etc etc&#8230;</p>
<p>No matter how well thought of your security scheme is, the weakest link will allways be the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ultram Online Without Prescription &raquo; We Always Have The LOWEST Pharmacy Online-Offers</title>
		<link>http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>hiiiii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiiiii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Ultram Online Without Prescription &raquo; We Always Have The LOWEST Pharmacy Online-Offers</title>
		<link>http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/comment-page-1/#comment-61258</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anaulin.org/wordpress/archives/2005/02/12/on-the-usefulness-of-passwords/#comment-61258</guid>
		<description>hiiiii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiiiii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

